Which of the following offenses could lead to a defendant being considered for a harsher sentence if they refuse to disclose co-conspirators?

In the context of Georgia criminal law, a defendant convicted of conspiracy may face harsher sentences if they refuse to disclose the identities of co-conspirators. This principle is grounded in the idea that cooperation with the authorities can lead to reduced sentences. The nature of conspiracy involves an agreement between two or more individuals to commit a crime, and revealing the identities of those involved can be crucial for law enforcement in dismantling criminal networks.

When a defendant remains uncooperative, especially in serious conspiracy cases, this lack of cooperation can be perceived as a failure to show remorse or a willingness to assist in law enforcement efforts. Consequently, judges may impose harsher penalties as a deterrent and a means to encourage future cooperation from defendants in similar circumstances.

In contrast, offenses like assault, larceny, and embezzlement do not generally carry similar considerations regarding co-conspirators. While these offenses can lead to severe penalties, the legal framework surrounding them does not typically involve the same expectation for cooperation that is seen in conspiracy cases.